The Case Against Monarchy - 1627 Words

The Case Against Monarchy The idea that a monarchy is the ideal form of government is a fallacy. Al-Farabi and Aquinas’ ideas about government are wrong, and are filled with irreparable holes. In modern times, the idea of a monarchy has become counter-intuitive and counter-productive. A democratic republic paired with an educated and empowered middle-class is the solution to the quandary of how to create the perfect government. While the ideas of the Arabic philosophers are interesting, there ideas on the perfection of monocratic rule are outdated by both new technology and new ideas Al-Farabi says that, â€Å"what is intended by mans existence is that he attains supreme happiness (Bailey 285).† Al-Farabi’s fixation is on that of what makes†¦show more content†¦Why must it be assumed that they are morally incompetent? Al-Farabi and Aquinas would argue that there is no one to hold up the social contract. They argue that even if everyone has a proper education, corruption will inevitably occur in a government based around fairness. Yet if we look to Plato and Aristotle, we can see that there can be a class in-between rich and poor who fight both morally and moderately. If we turn society to be based on merit instead of socio-economic standing, than we can create a government which is truly free of both class warfare and corruption. We can see a platonic government ruled by representatives made up of an Aristocratic class, one which is artificially engineered to work for the people. (Wikipedia contributors Platos five regimes). We can follow a polity-system government of Aristotle. We can see our government â€Å"characterized as a kind of â€Å"mixed† constitution typified by rule of the â€Å"middle† group of citizens, a moderately wealthy class between the rich and poor (Miller).â⠂¬  Just as rulers may command, we should allow our government of the educated middle-class to represent. Yet, while Aristotle and Plato provide a blueprint for government, what is a concrete example of a working democratic republic? The answer is of course the United States. The United States combines a unique system ofShow MoreRelatedMaximilien Robespierre, Leader of the French Revolution1442 Words   |  6 PagesFor centuries upon centuries, the monarchal system had dominated European life. The very nature of this method of rule incited rebellious feelings, as a definite imbalance of power was present. Understandably, people under this system had risen against authority. The glorious nation of France was no exception. The eighteenth century brought about a great deal of economic and social turmoil. By the end of this one hundred year period, rebellion had been talked about by many citizens for quiteRead MoreComparative Essay On The American And French Revolutions1486 Words   |  6 Pages3.1 Short Paper: Comparative Essay on the American and French Revolutions 1.) Why does the United States come out its revolution with a republic instead of a monarchy? Why do the French wind up with an Emperor Napoleon but the United States does not have a King George of the House of Washington? There are moments in our history where the citizens of the world stand up and for their beliefs, their honor, and themselves. They come together to reform the existing government that is holding themRead MoreGeorge Orwell s Animal Farm1710 Words   |  7 Pagesrise of Vladimir Lenin was against the ruling family that ruled Russia for more than 300 years. It was also against the rule of Russian tsars since Ivan IV, commonly known as â€Å" the Terrible†, in 1547. As the Bolsheviks, later known as the Communists, gained power, the Russian monarch Nicholas II lost power and control of the Russian Empire’s lands the Russians conquered from other nations over several decades. Many Russian citizens, including the army, were revolting against their own leader. In theRead MoreThomas Paines Common Sense Essay1149 Words   |  5 Pagesimplementing those ideas into a government that may be just and fair. Paine reflects on the English constitution specifically the crown. Pai ne also provide an insight to having a higher power to run a government. Paine also criticizes the idea of monarchy and hereditary succession. Complications would ultimately arise through his ideas and theories due to the differences in religions. Thomas Paine expresses his feelings toward the English constitution and its flaws specifically the crown. AccordingRead MoreThe Modern Monarchy of Britain Essay1676 Words   |  7 PagesFamily. This hallowed line of descendants makes up the British Monarchy, serving above the people of the Commonwealth under the control of Britain. With such fanfare and dignity come an equally great responsibility. While the structure and ceremonial hype surrounding the British Monarchy has remained nearly unchanged since its creation, the role and powers of Britains current Monarchy is significantly different. The British Monarchy is composed of a King or Queen and their family, whose heirs inheritRead MoreThomas Hobbes Ideas on Monarchy Essay918 Words   |  4 PagesAssessment on Hobbes Ideas on Monarchy Thomas Hobbes was a proponent of the monarchal system and in this paper I will prove that Hobbes was right in supporting the monarchal system of government, I will also show the opposing school of thought, and finally, I will give you my opinion on the monarchal system. Thomas Hobbes lived from 1588-1679 and throughout most of his life there was violence going on all around him. The biggest case was the English Civil War. This war lasted about seven yearsRead MoreSpanish Nationalism1115 Words   |  5 PagestheReconquista - beginning with the victory of Catholic forces against Muslim Moor forces in Granada in 1492 that resulted in a surge patriotic sentiment amongst Catholic Spaniards.[3] The development of Spanish nationalism has been tied to the state-building process of the Castillian-ruled Spanish monarchy. Just as in all other Western European nation-states (Portugal, France and England), the shaping of an authoritarian monarchy as of the late Middle Ages gave rise to the parallel secular developmentRead MoreA Unified Thai Kingdom1639 Words   |  7 Pagesit wasn’t until 1932 that the government switched from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional monarchy. An absolute monarchy means that the ultimate authority figure was chosen by some higher power and they didn’t have to follow any rules or abide by the laws of a constitution. An example of this type of ruler would be a King or Queen that was given their authority power by God. But in 1932, they became a constitutional monarchy which means that although their government is â€Å"run† by one person,Read MoreAp European History Reading Questions-Chapter 15 Essay examples1631 Words   |  7 Pagesfootsteps of Cardinal Richelieu in that aspect. His foreign policies were mainly against the Habsburg dynastys power and the ownership of French-speaking territories by nations other than France. Hence, his foreign policies included many wars. He took over the Spanish Netherlands and some of the United Provinces of Holland, and Franche-Comtà ©. However, his aggressive advances caused alliances to be formed against him which included the Habsburg domains of Spain and the Holy Roman Empire, EnglandRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s King Lear1510 Words   |  7 Pagesto numerous inner and outer conflicts of each character. However, as it is brought into being a character, Edgar in the end of the story, it implies new beginning of the kingdom. In addition, as comparing king Lear with Edgar, two social systems, monarchy and democracy can be evaluated. Democracy pursues freedom with less government intervention. This promotes each individual to take his/her own responsibility and protects the interest of citizenship. It also has stability in administration as